Zitat:
Zitat von der kleine Prinz 
... auch die USA können durch Gesetzesänderung ihre Zahlstellen "immunisieren".
|
... anscheinend sind sie bereits "immunisiert" ... durch
U.C.C. Article 4-A-503:
Zitat:
| For proper cause and in compliance with applicable law, a court may restrain (i) a person from issuing a payment order to initiate a funds transfer, (ii) an originator's bank from executing the payment order of the originator, or (iii) the beneficiary's bank from releasing funds to the beneficiary or the beneficiary from withdrawing the funds. A court may not otherwise restrain a person from issuing a payment order, paying or receiving payment of a payment order, or otherwise acting with respect to a funds transfer. |
... deshalb wurden in dem
Pari-Passu-Urteil Bedenken hinsichtlich der Umsetzung geäußert:
Zitat:
| However, we do have concerns about the Injunctions’ application to banks acting as pure intermediaries in the process of sending money from Argentina to the holders of the Exchange Bonds. Under Article 4-A of the U.C.C., intermediary banks, which have no obligations to any party with whom they do not deal directly, are not subject to injunctions relating to payment orders. See, e.g., N.Y. U.C.C. § 4-A-503 cmt. Any system that seeks to force intermediary banks to stop payments by a particular entity for a particular purpose imposes significant costs on intermediary banks and risks delays in payments unrelated to the targeted Exchange Bond payments. |
... auch die FED und die
Argentinien-Anwälte haben darauf hingewiesen, dass die Euroclear-Blockade (Belgien 2000) in den USA nicht realisierbar ist:
Zitat:
| As the Federal Reserve noted in its 2004 amicus brief, the relief to which NML then suggested it was entitled – an injunction like the one Elliott had obtained in Belgium – would have been precluded by Article 4-A-503 of the U.C.C. |
>>> ... US-Zahlstellen, die Neubond-Cashflows nicht zu 100% weiterleiten, werden selbst zu "juristischen Zielen".
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen