Anhängige und bereits entschiedene Klagen (die von diesen Büros durchgeführt werden/wurden):
Applestein vs. Provincia de Buenos Aires (2002). With judgment (2003)
Applestein vs. Argentina (2002). With judgment (2003)
Kalberman vs. Argentina (2002). With judgment (2003)
Etevob vs. Argentina (2003). With judgment (2004)
Franceschi vs. Argentina (2003). With judgment (2004)
Mazzini vs. Argentina (2003). With judgment (2005)
Prima vs. Argentina (2004). With judgment (2006)
Mazoral vs. Argentina (2004). With judgment (2006)
Morata vs. Argentina (2004). With judgment (2006)
Moldes vs. Argentina (2004). With judgment (2006)
Cilli vs. Argentina (2004). With judgment (2006)
Buczat vs. Argentina (2004). With judgment (2006)
Rosa vs. Argentina (2004). With judgment (2006)
Consolini vs. Argentina (2005). With judgment (2006)
Legnaro vs. Argentina (2005). With judgment (2006)
Martinez vs. Argentina (2005). With judgment (2006)
Ferri vs. Argentina (2005). With judgment (2006)
Rigueiro vs. Argentina (2005). With judgment (2006)
Sauco vs. Argentina (2005). With judgment (2006)
Bettoni vs. Argentina (2005). With judgment (2006)
Fedecostante vs. Argentina (2005). With judgment (2006)
Lisi vs. Argentina (2005) With judgment (2006)
Rossini vs. Argentina (2005). With judgment (2006)
Klein vs. Argentina (2005). With judgment (2007)
Botti vs. Argentina (2005). With judgment (2006)
Lovatti vs. Argentina (2005). With judgment (2006)
Pasquali vs. Argentina (2005). With judgment (2006)
Bolland vs. Argentina (2006)
Amoroso vs. Argentina (2006)
Bliway vs. Argentina (2006)
Ivelo Holding Corp. vs. Argentina (2006)
Tadayon vs. Argentina (2006)
Beyer vs. Argentina (2007)
Palladini vs. Argentina (2007)
Catto vs. Argentina (2007)
Palladini vs. Argentina (2007)
1 Kommentar:
105 Mio. USD sind nach wie vor in den USA eingefroren/gepfändet
und an dieser Sache sind meine Freunde aus Buenos Aires beteiligt
4.5 Court of Appeals – New York.
4.5.1 Attachment for $ 105,000,000 over the Republic of Argentina Central Bank’s
funds on January 2006.
4.5.2 The Court of Appeals has denied the attachment on January 2007.
4.5.3 Based on new legal technical matters, the attachment was filed again,
freezing the funds.
(Punkt 4.5.3 ist Stand seit Anfang 2007)
Kommentar veröffentlichen