A. PROCEDURAL HISTORY................................................................................................. 1
B. PARTIES’ ARGUMENTS REGARDING THE PROPOSAL TO DISQUALIFY
PROFESSORS TERCIER AND VAN DEN BERG AND THE ARBITRATORS’
EXPLANATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 12
1. Argentina’s Proposal for Disqualification ......................................................................... 12
2. Claimants’ Observations .................................................................................................... 14
3. Arbitrators’ Explanations ................................................................................................... 16
C. DECISION BY THE CHAIRMAN ................................................................................... 16
1. Request for Recommendation ............................................................................................ 16
2. Timeliness .......................................................................................................................... 16
3. Merits ................................................................................................................................. 17
D. DECISION ......................................................................................................................... 20
D. DECISION 
83. Having considered all of the facts alleged and the arguments submitted by the parties, and 
for the reasons stated above, the Chairman rejects the Argentine Republic’s Proposal to 
Disqualify Professor Pierre Tercier and Professor Albert Jan van den Berg. 
[Signed] 
______________________________________ 
Chairman of the ICSID Administrative Council 
Dr. Jim Yong Kim 
https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC4152_En&caseId=C95
 
 
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen