Gesamtzahl der Seitenaufrufe

Mittwoch, 5. März 2014

Additional English Clip: Moody’s: “Impact of Court Ruling on Argentina’s Debt on Future Sovereign Debt Restructurings is Likely Limited” (Duggar, Attached) Lead Articles: El Cronista: “What Cristina doesn’t talk about, and isn’t in the mood to announce” La Nacion: “After the Repsol agreement, YPF goes out to seek investors” La Nacion: “Provinces turn to the U.S. to fight against drug trafficking”

Lead Articles:
 
El Cronista: “What Cristina doesn’t talk about, and isn’t in the mood to announce”
 
La Nacion: “After the Repsol agreement, YPF goes out to seek investors”
 
La Nacion: “Provinces turn to the U.S. to fight against drug trafficking”
 
OTHER NEWS ITEMS:
·         Argentine stocks were hammered along with other emerging countries in trading over the crisis in Ukraine.  El Cronista reports that Foreign Minister Hector Timerman, in Geneva for a conference on the death penalty, met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, telling his Russian counterpart he is willing to offer “peaceful alternatives” to solve the crisis, “which respect human rights and the United Nations Charter,” but didn’t take any further position. 
·         The government has not yet taken any public position on the Ukraine crisis, nor has any FpV figure come out with a trial balloon position.  The pro-K Pagina/12 has an article which relativizes the conflict to show a bumbling, incompetent European Union, a hypocritical United States and a “neoliberal” Russia causing a dangerous global crisis.
·         Opposition blocks in Congress are demanding a special session on March 19 to debate the revoking of the Iran MOU on the AMIA bombing, and definitively overturning the agreement.
·         La Nacion reports that the U.S. State Department’s annual report on global drug trafficking indicates that cocaine production in Argentina is small, but a growing problem. (http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/222881.pdf  Page 95, “Country Report: Argentina)
 
 
TRENDING TOPICS/ARGENTINA on Twitter:
·         “Ucrania” (Ukraine), “Rusia” (Russia) are trending in the top ten this morning.
 

 
 
El Cronista
What Cristina doesn’t talk about, and isn’t in the mood to announce
 
Tuesday, March 4, 2014
 
By Maximiliano Montenegro, Journalist and Economist
 
It was the last speech before Congress with a horizon in front, 20 months, enough for announcing transcendent decisions and to trust that they will be carried out.  The next, in March 2015, eight months from the election of her successor, will be almost a testimonial, a review of the inventory for the future resident of the Casa Rosada.  
 
However, Cristina said nothing.
 
She said nothing about inflation, which has devoured the bases of the economic model.  The main reason for the flight of capital (“I am the grandmother of the runs on the peso,” she admitted), the exchange rate delay, the clamp and the final round of the devaluation.
 
Equal to the last six years, she didn’t even say the word.  Despite the fact that inflation is no longer 25%, as she indignantly denied in the recorded conference at Harvard.  That the trade unions are resisting any salary increases below 30% is the best proof that the floor is even higher now.
 
The well-worn denunciation of businessmen and speculators that are “plundering wallets” because “there is no justification for price increases” is valid as a political marketing strategy.  The same from the request to Congress for “instruments that defend consumers against abuse from concentrated sectors.”  But that is irrelevant in fighting inflation.  A “distraction,” in the words of Mario Blejer, an economist with the ear of Daniel Scioli.  Why didn’t they move ahead sooner with these laws to end with the “abusive” increases?  Why didn’t the innumerable “cared-for prices” agreements of Moreno have an effect?  How did we get here?  
 
If there were a plan, it was the best moment to announce it.  Chart a course, set milestones and create expectations of a way out from this present dark gray area.
 
Perhaps the main difficulty that Cristina has in explaining the plan is that she is doing what she said she’d never do: devaluation, interest rate hikes, cooling the economy, salary ceilings and pension payments below inflation.  Classic orthodox recipe.
 
The Economy Ministry’s goal is to reach July or August, when the soy dollars end, with contained inflation, even at the cost of a greater recession and the fall in salary purchasing power.  They acknowledge in the government that if they fail in the game and inflation in these coming 5-6 months surpasses 20%, then in July or August the dollar at 8 pesos will be unsustainable and the reserves will go back to falling and pressures will rise for greater devaluation, like at the end of last year.  With the added problem of the economy being much colder and the political margin will be smaller, because in the second half of this year, the 2015 race will begin.
 
Cristina also said nothing about the plan to aspire to be Bolivia.  Minister Axel Kicillof promised her that with the Repsol agreement, the new INDEC price index demanded by the IMF, and the negotiation with the IMF and the Paris Club, he’d be able to smooth out the adjustment if he could manage to unblock dollar financing for Argentina.  
 
While it is not so appealing as comparing oneself to Australia and Canada, in this aspect, Bolivia is the model.  It issued debt last year at a rate of 4.5%, when Argentina would have paid 12% or 13%.  To compensate for this “Argentine risk”, the financing of the payment of US$5 billion to Repsol over the expropriation of YPF costs 8.75% plus a guarantee of US$1 billion in extra bonds that will have to be issued if the oil company sells the bonds at the current price of similar paper.  If Argentina were Bolivia, that purchase –in installments – would come out far cheaper.  Evo Morales’ credit card offers better discounts than Cristina’s today.
 
The problem of moving forward with this program without announcing it is that it will not end up recovering a very precious asset in the economy which the government lacks right now: credibility. Jorge Capitanich is the most skeptical of all: he often cites the case of Roberto Lavagna in April 2002, when he became Duhalde’s minister, and rather than announce a plan that no one would believe in, he dedicated himself to rebuilding trust with ad hoc measures, and disarm the run on the currency. But at that time there had already been a monumental adjustment with a 250% spike in the dollar, frozen wages and the collapse of consumption and employment. The economy is not traveling this wild path, nor is the government so weak.
 
Even so, Cristina refuses to unfurl the roadmap and sit down with union chiefs, business owners and even leaders of the opposition at a table to coordinate expectations around three key challenges in the short term. First, close on collective bargaining with a credible promise of slowing inflation. Second, cut subsidies and unfreeze rates for public services to narrow the fiscal deficit and reduce the printing of pesos. And finally, a reversal in the K-narrative, a return to the credit market in dollars, after an agreement with the Paris Club for the refinancing of close to US$ 10 billion in debt that the next administration must face.
 
These are all sensitive objectives in policy, and with an uncertain outcome. For example, the Abeceb consultancy estimates that cutting electrical subsidies would have a bi-monthly cost in the metropolitan area on average of 66 to 550 pesos; something unworkable to implement from one day to the next,  and which will require administrative expertise. Meanwhile, on Friday, during a seminar with economists from investment banks in New York, there was discussion over whether Argentina would access cheap credit this year or next: some said yes, because the market could, by anticipating political change, finance the transition; but others thought that the government would eventually liquidate its reserves.
 
The risk of addressing that agenda against the clock without revealing a plan is that, once the rain shower of soy dollars ends along with its soothing effect, the lack of credibility in the official policy will rise again. In that case, the cost will be high: more recession or more inflation with a run to the dollar. Options that no one would want to face.
 
 
La Nacion
After the Repsol agreement, YPF goes out to seek investors
It will organize a trip for more than 30 American businessmen
 
Tuesday, March 4, 2014
 
by Pablo Fernández Blanco  | LA NACION
 
Susan Segal is an old, well-known figure among Argentine business leaders.  She has led the Americas Society and the Council of the Americas since 2003, which are the entities that every year hold a big meeting at the Hotel Alvear –occasionally repeated in New York – which topline political leaders attend, as well as almost all the important business figures of the local market.
 
This ex-banker, who cultivated a close relationship with President Cristina Kirchner, is one of the first cogs in the wheel that the YPF leadership will deploy, under the guidance of Miguel Galuccio, to publicize among international investors the ease of becoming a partner in the state-run oil company after the agreement reached by the government with YPF to settle the expropriation of 51% of Repsol’s stake for US$5 billion.  
 
Although confirmations are still lacking, YPF wants the President and CEO of the Council, as it is nicknamed among companies, to organize the first investor trip for the company in years. The idea is that this month a group of 30 investors, among them bankers, pension fund and investment fund administrators, will depart together from Houston to Ezeiza, passing by the YPF Tower in Puerto Madero and arriving in Neuquén to observe the work of YPF in the formation of non-conventional fuels in Vaca Muerta, one of the assets of the company that oil investors are closely following.
 
It will be the first strong move to "sell" the company after the agreement with Repsol. It is, however, a move that Galuccio started deploying yesterday in Houston. The YPF President traveled to the oil city to participate in CERA Week, a global gathering that brings together the popes of the industry. Yesterday evening, he dined with some of his peers. In the meeting, organized by John Watson, the CEO of Chevron (who is a YPF partner in Vaca Muerta), there were Chris Finlayson (BG), Andrew Mackenzie (BHP Billiton), Steve Riney (BP), Olivier de Langavant (Total) and Martin Bachmann (Wintershall), all of them heads of their companies.
 
According to executives who attended the meeting, Galuccio put forth an argument: he recounted the good results in production and the strength of YPF's non-conventional reserves. He recalled that while Vaca Muerta is the most hyped of all, the company has an extensive portion of the so-called D-129, which runs underneath Chubut and Santa Cruz. It is still unexplored, and according to his judgment, it has great potential.
 
Last night, Galuccio participated in another dinner at which the main speaker was Emilio Lozoya, CEO of Pemex, the state oil company of Mexico. Lozoya has a personal relationship with the Argentine. And he was one of those who pushed Repsol and its President, Antonio Brufau, to continue the negotiation that led to the end of the conflict with the Spanish company.
 
Since he landed at YPF, in May 2012, Galuccio has insisted that the future of YPF depended on ending the dispute with Repsol peacefully. He took charge of the uncertainties until last week, but he recovered some oxygen after the announcement of the agreement. "Now, YPF will go out to the world", said an executive who works with him daily.
 
Production increased in January
 
YPF oil production recorded a sharp rise in January, according to the company. According to data from the Energy Ministry, in the first month of the year oil extraction by the company grew 9.8%, while gas climbed another 9.2%, compared with the same month of the previous year.
 
"YPF’s monthly oil production has been growing continuously from April 2013, while gas has grown from May of the same year, due to the strong level of investment that the company maintained over the past year, yp to six billion dollars,” said the company in a statement.
 
The data does not include the production by holdings acquired by Petrobras and Apache.
 
 
La Nacion
Provinces turn to the U.S. to fight against drug trafficking
 
Tuesday, March 4, 2014
 
by Martín Dinatale | LA NACION
 
Three years after Foreign Minister Héctor Timerman seized an American plane at Ezeiza which had arrived to train federal police in the fight against drugs, Argentina has resumed strategic collaboration contacts with the United States.  But it is doing so in an indirect manner: now it’s the governors – some with the permission of the Casa Rosada – who are signing agreements with Washington to deal with drug trafficking, a growing menace in their districts.   
 
The image of Timerman opening, pliers in hand, “sensitive material” from the C-17 Globemaster III, in February 2011, has been forgotten, and the anti-drug offices of the United States have resumed their collaboration with the country on training courses, exchange of secret information and mobilization tasks  in the hotter drug trafficking areas.
 
In recent months, at least five governors have signed collaboration agreement with offices such as the DEA, FBI, and other units of the Department of State.
 
Diplomatic sources and provincial officials said that, so far, Buenos Aires, Chubut, Salta, Mendoza and Santa Fe have made a rapprochement with Washington. Security Secretary Sergio Berni has also had well-oiled contacts with United States on the issue.
 
Kevin Sullivan, Chargé d'affaires of the Embassy of United States in Buenos Aires, confirmed the participation of his country in advisory tasks to LA NACION. "For us, it is important to continue to work with the national government and the provincial authorities, to see which strategies can be applied to deal with drug trafficking."
 
At the same time, the current top official at the American Embassy, since Washington has not sent its new ambassador, added: "We are maintaining open communication with both the national government and the provincial authorities".
 
Sullivan emphasized also that the United States "is willing to expand these channels of cooperation [in the fight against drug trafficking] if the Argentine representatives requested it.”
 
This means that Washington will agree to lengthen the list of governors that request collaboration and help from the United States to combat drug trafficking.
 
Despite Timerman, the Casa Rosada confirmed the growing level of cooperation that exists with the United States in combatting drug trafficking in Argentina.
 
"The episode of the American military aircraft and Timerman was now subscribed to the foreign minister himself.  From here forward, we will modify this line,” a prominent Minister who handles issues related to the fight against drugs said, honestly, to LA NACION.
 
This can be seen in different ways: the exchange of sensitive information, the support and training of security forces in the United States and in some cases the donation of equipment needed to confront drug trafficking gangs.
 
Law 26.052 allows provinces to be granted greater power in the fight against drug trafficking. So far, eight provinces have used this rule for different reasons. Most of the districts that were able to expand the powers of action for their courts and police in the fight against drug trafficking have asked for help from the United States.
 
Cases
 
For example, the Governor of Mendoza, Francisco Pérez, established an agreement so that four officials from the Directorate of Drug Crimes that he created will receive courses of instruction in Washington for the fight against drugs. "Governor Pérez is concerned about this scourge and is determined to move forward with all the cooperation that is necessary," a close associate of the Mendoza leader told LA NACION.
 
Elsewhere, the Governor of Santa Fe, Antonio Bonfatti, and his Security minister, Raúl Lambert, met last month in Washington with representatives from the State Department, who provided them a hard diagnosis of the growth of violence and drugs not only in Santa Fe, but also in Cordoba and Entre Rios.
 
This diagnosis is part of the annual report on the advance of drug trafficking in the world that the United States government released yesterday. According to qualified Washington sources, a harsher diagnosis in the Argentine chapter was expected, if compared with the last year's report.
 
Bonfatti not only took a pessimistic diagnosis home from Washington, but also carried the commitment of help from experts in the fight against drug trafficking. In fact, a group of Santa Fe experts in criminal investigations against drug trafficking attended FBI courses. But Santa Fe not only got the collaboration of the United States in this matter. It also received help from Israel, Colombia and Brazil.
 
On his recent trip to New York, Daniel Scioli also strengthened his ties with the United States administration to receive cooperation and exchange of information on drug trafficking. Thus, Buenos Aires, which has more than 60 specialized prosecutors and 100 judges to combat illicit drug trafficking, will get receve direct support from U.S. anti-drug offices.
 
The Governor of Chubut, Martín Buzzi, has just made arrangements with Washington to set up a series of cooperation agreements with special forces in the fight against drug trafficking and its province police would be trained in the field.
 
In Salta, cooperation with the DEA is quite advanced and Governor Juan Manuel Urtubey is convinced that without the help of its experts it would be impossible to combat drug trafficking. From January up to now, there were more than 60 arrests for drug trafficking in Salta, and this, Urtubey’s aides say, was due largely to foreign aid from the United States.
 
In the case of the Security Ministry, the situation has changed substantially in relation to the link with the United States. Minister Arturo Puricelli, and Berni, are convinced that collaboration with the United States is "necessary and key" to combat drug trafficking in the region. It is not an ideological analysis of the problem, but a factual one.
 
So, this sector of the Casa Rosada has left behind its period of “isolation” from Washington, which former Security Minister Nilda Garre faced at the time. It would seem that Timerman and his pliers in hand has also been left in the past, at least in the view of several governors and Kirchnerist officials.  
 
 
 

Dienstag, 4. März 2014

El Cronista Highlighting Argentina’s progress in New York, but warning about the deficit

El Cronista
Highlighting Argentina’s progress in New York, but warning about the deficit
The discussion of the seminar organized by the Emerging Markets Traders Association in New York turned on the country’s macroeconomic situation.  Analysts highlighted the management by Fábrega and the government’s policy on the international front.  However, they put into question the fiscal deficit, energy subsidies and inflation.  The lawsuit with the vulture funds in New York was in a secondary place.  The most optimistic analyses were that the Supreme Court could hear the Argentine case.
 
Monday, March 3, 2014
 
By Maria Elena Candia
 
"There was a very strong consensus that Argentina is not Ukraine nor Venezuela and that is economic situation is far from being like it is in those countries,” said Walter Molano, chief economist at BCP Securities, reviewing the climate that the seminar had about Argentina, organized by the Emerging Markets Traders Association (EMTA) on Friday in New York, which the economist moderated.
 
The meeting, which was sponsored by Puente, brought together investors and analysts to discuss the current and future state of the Argentine economy.  There was a kind of consensus among panelists in recognizing the measures that the government is taking on the international front – like the agreement it signed with Repsol – together with the leadership of the Central Bank under the control of Fábrega. But they also remarked that the government will have to resolve the fiscal deficit for attacking inflation.  
 
In addition to Molano, the seminar included Arturo Porzecanski, professor at The American University, Casey Reckman, analyst from Credit Suisse, Vladimir Werning, director from JP Morgan and economist Guillermo Nielsen.
 
For Molano, Argentina has imbalances that at some point will have to be addressed.  “The problem that was mentioned as being central was around energy subsidies, which feed the fiscal deficit and the monetization of the economy, which pushes up inflation and the distortions in the exchange rate.  The solution is out there,” Molano explained in an interview with El Cronista, highlighting that the macroeconomic issues were the center of the discussions in an auditorium that had perfect attendance.  
 
"We see some steps in the right direction, like the commitment with the international agenda and a more active management of monetary policy.  However, our main concern is that, in the absence of a strategy to fight against inflation that includes a significant fiscal adjustment, we could see greater pressure on the peso at the end of this year.  Otherwise, the government will not be occupying itself with the key underlying questions,” warned  Casey Reckman, analyst for Credit Suisse, in statements to this newspaper.  
 
In relation to how they panelists see the country’s near future, Arturo Porzecanski admitted to have painted the darkest scenario.  “When people return from their carnival vacations they will find higher prices, which will influence collective bargaining, by which the atmosphere will be very hot.  Contrary to what happened in previous years, when companies could earn well and compensate workers for inflation and the government could also count on sufficient resources to give increases, now tax revenue isn’t enough.  This makes it clear that nobody could aspire to a 35% salary increase to compensate for inflation,”  Porzecanski explained to El Cronista.
 
While the increase in interest rates helped stabilize the currency exchange market, this is a factor that eliminates credit power and the margins of investment.  “This will affect the level of activity.  It remains to be seen how severe the recession will be this year,” Porzecanski said.
 
The lawsuit Argentina maintains with the holdouts in the U.S. Supreme Court, which is always on the agenda of questions about Argentina, was also part of the discussion, while in second place.  According to Vladimir Werning, the Court will accept the Argentine case and also will ask for the opinion of the American government.  He said that other governments in addition to France will support the country’s position, which will convince the highest court that a problem of international scope is being put forth.  

Montag, 3. März 2014

wo liegen unser PBA-Bonds (EUR)


Security Name :EUR 4,00 BUENOS AIRES PROV. (REGS) 06-2035
Common Code :000023408287
ISIN Code :XS0234082872
Nominal Currency (ISO) :EUR - EURO
Issuer Name :BUENOS AIRES, PROVINCE OF
Issuer Country :ARGENTINA
Security Physical Form :COMMON GLOBAL
Instrument Category :DEBT
Instrument Group :BOND
SWIFT Instr. Quantifier (Field 36B) :FAMT
Total Volume Issued :467,850,954
Instrument Creation Date :25-Oct-2005
Actual Closing Date :12-Jan-2006
Closing Date :12-Jan-2006
Distribution Date :13-Jan-2006
Maturity Date :15-May-2035
Back Value Flag :0
Back Valuation Type :BV if Settled on Distribution Date
CFI :DBFSAR
Process Purpose :SETTLANDCUST
Legal Form :REGIST
CBL Settlement Status :Eligible for settlement
Income Details
Frequency :Every 6 months
 Current EventPrevious Event
Interest Rate :44
Pool Factor :11
Payment Currency :EUREUR
Payment Date :15-May-201415-Nov-2013
Value Date :15-May-201415-Nov-2013
Record Date :30-Apr-201431-Oct-2013
Start Date :15-Nov-201315-May-2013
End Date :15-May-201415-Nov-2013
Interest Rate Calculation Method :30/36030/360
Number of Days :180180
Tax Rate :00
Gross Income Amount :2020
Tax Details
Subject to Withholding Tax :No
Subject to FATCA :No
Other Information
Depository/CSP :6B - BKNY MELLON, LDN
Safekeeper/CSK :6B - BKNY MELLON, LDN
CFF Qualified :No
Market Category :EURO
Multiple Depository Flag :SINGLE LISTED
Bridge Eligible Flag :Yes
Minimum Settlement Amount :1
Multiple Settlement Amount :1
ISMAG Adherence :NONE
Internal Instruction Account Flag :NORESTRICTION
External Instruction Account Flag :NORESTRICTION

Sonntag, 2. März 2014

"The issues here are incredibly important not just for Argentina but for the U.S. government and all foreign sovereigns," said Paul Clement, at a briefing on the case at the Argentine embassy in Washington, D.C

Argentina warns of bond case impact on debt restructuring

WASHINGTON Thu Feb 27, 2014 12:27pm EST

RELATED TOPICS

Feb 27 (Reuters) - A lawyer for the Argentine government warned on Thursday there would be broad international consequences if the U.S. Supreme Court does not reverse lower court decisions ordering the country to pay $1.33 billion to hedge fund creditors.
"The issues here are incredibly important not just for Argentina but for the U.S. government and all foreign sovereigns," said Paul Clement, at a briefing on the case at the Argentine embassy in Washington, D.C.
He filed a petition with the Supreme Court on Feb. 18 on behalf of Argentina asking the justices to reverse a ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York.
That ruling was in favor of bondholders who refused to accept Argentina's two debt-restructuring offers after the country defaulted on $100 billion in 2002.
Should the lower court rulings be left intact, Clement said, there would be "powerful incentives" for other creditors to hold out when offered the opportunity to renegotiate debt terms.
A former senior lawyer in President George W. Bush's administration, Clement said his time working in government meant he understood the possible international implications of the lower court rulings.
Sergio Chodos, Argentina's alternative executive director before the International Monetary Fund, raised similar concerns.
The appeals court ruling threatens "the merely feasibility of having debt restructurings going forward," he said.
Clement declined to comment on which countries and entities
Argentina expected to file supportive court filings, known as amicus briefs, asking the Supreme Court to hear the case. These could potentially include the U.S. government and the IMF.
"We would expect there to be substantial amicus support for the petition," Clement said.
The holdout bondholders are led by hedge funds Aurelius Capital Management and NML Capital Ltd, a unit of billionaire Paul Singer's Elliott Management Corp.
They have previously said the dispute could be resolved if Argentina was willing to negotiate and criticized Argentina's government for threatening to ignore U.S. court rulings.

If the justices agree to hear the case, a decision could come between October, when the next Supreme Court term begins, and June 2015, the end of the term. (Additional reporting byKevin Gray in Buenos Aires; Editing by Sophie Hares)
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/27/usa-court-argentina-idUSL1N0LW1N020140227

Lead Articles: Telam: “Vulture funds: Argentina’s attorney warns of the danger of the decisions of the U.S. judiciary” Clarin: “The government defends its position in the U.S. against the vulture funds” Clarin: “Return to orthodoxy: now they are flirting with the IMF” Ambito Financiero: “Blejer: “Good for both parties””

Telam
Vulture funds: Argentina’s attorney warns of the danger of the decisions of the U.S. judiciary
 
Friday, February 28, 2014
 
Paul Clement, who acts as the country’s legal counsel in the case against the vulture funds, warned that if the Supreme Court upholds the rulings of lower courts in favor of the holders of debt in default, it will put in danger the systems of voluntary debt restructurings, by the “power” that this will give to the holdouts.
 
"If the current interpretation of the lower courts about “pari passu” is upheld, it will radically change the balance of power in favor of the holdouts to such an extent that it would put in danger the voluntary restructurings of sovereign debt,” said the former Solicitor General of the United States during the administration of George W. Bush, during a meeting organized by the Argentine embassy in Washington.  
 
Clement also argued that “the courts’ evasion of foreign sovereign immunity is an issue of interest for all sovereign (states).”  
 
The panel of the meeting, which brought together more than 100 experts from the White House, the Congress, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the Inter-American Development Bank, among other experts, was also made up by Ambassador Cecilia Nahon and the Argentine representative before the IMF, Sergio Chodos.
 
The meeting was convened under the title: “Sovereign debt restructuring: Why (the case) NML v. Argentina is important to all.”
 
The expert attorney in cases before the U.S. Supreme Court centered his speech on the key arguments of the extraordinary recourse (writ of certiorari) presented by Argentina before the highest court on February 18, in which he asked for review of the “erroneous” decisions taken by lower courts in New York.
 
"If the current interpretation about pari passu (equal treatment clause) from the lower courts is upheld, it will radically change the balance of power in favor of the holdouts to such an extent that will put in danger the voluntary restructurings of sovereign debt,” he warned before more than 100 experts present at the meeting.
 
Rulings issued first by Judge Thomas Griesa and upheld by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit of New York, hinder Argentina from making payments on its debt unless it pays in full (an amount of approximately US$1.330 billion) creditors who opted not to enter in the restructuring of sovereign debt.
 
The method of payment set up and supported by the lower courts, ordering the country to follow it, is that funds allocated to pay the bondholders who entered the swaps in 2005 and 2010 must be used to pay them, which could trigger a technical default on Argentina's debt given the impossibility of honoring the restructured  bondholders.
 
In their speeches, both Ambassador Nahon as the Argentine representative at the IMF, Sergio Chodos, focused on the systemic implications of the Argentine case.
 
Officials recalled that various different actors like the United States, France, the G-77 plus China, and institutions like the IMF, and experts such as economists Joseph Stiglitz and Nouriel Roubini, have already warned about the possible effects that the issue might have should it be resolved according to the thinking of the New York judiciary.
 
All these actors " warned about the consequences of this case for the future of debt restructuring, the stability and predictability of global financial markets, and the reputation of New York as a key global financial center," said the embassy in a statement.
 
Nahon said that the resolution of the case that pits Argentina against the vulture funds "will determine whether a minority of debt speculators can obtain a new weapon that will strengthen holdouts around the world," threatening the flow of payments to bondholders who agree to debt restructurings.
 
This, in turn, "would make such restructurings impossible in the future,” said Nahon.
 
For his part, Chodos said that "Argentina is fighting for its right to pay.”
 
[NOTE: The above Telam piece also ran in Ambito Financiero and Pagina/12 in excerpted form.]
 
 
Clarin
The government defends its position in the U.S. against the vulture funds  
There were diplomats, officials of that country and analysts.  Nahon and Clement spoke.
 
Friday, February 28, 2014
 
by Ana Baron -New York, correspondent
 
In a new attempt to counter the lobby of the vulture funds, the Argentine embassy in Washington organized a conference about the case “Argentina vs NML”, whose main speaker was Paul Clement.  
 
The former Solicitor General of United States, currently the star lawyer who drafted the appeal which was filed before the Supreme Court, Clement warned that if the Supreme Court upholds the ruling requiring the Argentina to pay the vulture funds at the same time as it pays the restructured bondholders, it will tilt the balance of the "power" for the former, and threaten voluntary debt restructuring.
 
"What surprised me most was that Clement’s presentation, like the ones from Ambassador Cecilia Nahón and the Argentine representative to the IMF Sergio Chodos, were more political than legal," one of the invitees told Clarin.
 
The professor specializing in international finance from Georgetown University, Anna Gelpern, told this newspaper that "two of my students went in my place and they told me that it was all very political.”
 
Clement said at the breakfast that "If the current interpretation of the lower courts on pari passu is upheld, it will radically change the balance of power in favor of the holdouts and will jeopardize voluntary sovereign debt restructurings.”
 
Among the approximately 100 officials of the U.S. government and Congress, invited representatives from international agencies and analysts, one of the most prominent present was representative of Brazil to the IMF, Paul Nogueira Batista. In fact, a source told Clarin that the Argentine government continues to hope that Brazil and the IMF will send amicus curiae briefs in favor of Argentina to the U.S. Supreme Court. The IMF had intentions of doing so when our country appealed the first time, but in the end, the U.S. objected and the Fund had to reverse course.
 
The offensive by the vulture funds against Argentina is such that at the entrance of the embassy there were people handing out pamphlets entitled "Paul Clement, defender of Argentina’s shameful conduct before the U.S. courts.”
 
No journalistic media was invited to the conference except Telam, the official news agency, which runs counter to the embassy’s efforts to counter the vulture funds’ lobby.
 
In the press release that the embassy circulated, Nahon said that the resolution of the case that pits Argentina against the vulture funds "will determine if a minority of debt speculators will obtain a new weapon that will strengthen holdouts around the world," threatening the flow of payments to bondholders who agreed to debt restructuring.
 
For his part, Chodos said that "Argentina is fighting for its right to pay.”
 
 
Clarin
Return to orthodoxy: now they are flirting with the IMF
 
Friday, February 28, 2014
 
by Marcelo Bonelli
 
The Casa Rosada is studying getting even closer to economic orthodoxy. After the heavy adjustment he implemented, Axel Kicillof wants to open negotiations with the International Monetary Fund.
 
Jorge Capitanich confirmed it is this week to his inner circle: "We will accept the Fund reviewing the economy". The Cabinet Chief said that, together with Kicillof, they were "fighting the inner battle" to embrace the IMF again. The goal would be to go back to borrowing from Wall Street to strengthen the sagging reserves. They are seeking US$ 10 billion. The return to orthodoxy is also due to another urgency: to have the support of the United States in the lawsuit with the holdouts. The deadline for the Treasury to submit a brief to the Court expires at the end of March.
 
But the move exposes the inconsistency of the official narrative and Kicillof’s double discourse.
 
The issue was taken up at a secret meeting between Capitanich and the heads of the UIA. Héctor Méndez and Daniel Funes de Rioja expressed their anger over the government operations against business owners. They also warned about the risks of Héctor Recalde’s bill, which seeks make food companies, textile companies and manufacturers of production materials "subject to intervention.” Capitanich said: "Be calm, economic way out is a step away." But this run against the clock has a heavy burden: the total lack of credibility abroad for the Minister and his team.
 
The government is promoting a virtual agreement with the Paris Club, but reality is different. Ramon Fernández, the head of the entity, was very clear with Kicillof in their meeting: he rejected Argentina’s offer because it did not meet the minimum conditions required by an international negotiation.
 
Now, the Paris Club has sent a request for information from Buenos Aires with some humiliating and cutting questions for officials. The text signed by Clotilde L'Angevin did not open any serious negotiations, as Kicillof tried to explain at the Olivos compound.
 
In Cristina’s entourage, Daniel Scioli suggested addressing Kicillof’s anemia and adding experts such as Mario Blejer and Guillermo Nielsen to the international talks. Yesterday, Nielsen was in Manhattan at a bankers’ event. Cristina rejected the advice: "Daniel, let Axel have very good non-conventional ideas to resolve the issue." The government has already stumbled by believing that the proposal from the Gramercy Fund would end the lawsuit of the holdouts. Black Rock - the main holder of Argentine bonds - reported that it withdrew from the proposal and, therefore, the efforts by financier Gustavo Ferraro - intimate friend of Amado Boudou - ended in a total inconsistency.
 
Now Cristina is seeking another magic formula and has asked the Fintech Advisory Fund to begin negotiations to buy the debt in litigation with the vulture fund NML Capital. David Martinez - the head of Fintech, which acquired Telecom - is willing to start probing, but demanded sources of financing to be able to negotiate with Paul Singer.
 
The agreement with Repsol also seeks to bring relief the external front. For that reason, Kicillof made a 180 degree turn to appease Spain. As Vice Minister, in the autumn of 2012, he said at Olivos that Repsol would not be paid "a single dollar.” Now, the agreement is deteriorating Kicillof’s image.  The government had demanded that Antonio Brufau be removed to begin negotiations, but that backfired, since it ended up strengthening Brufau’s image with the advantages conceded to Repsol.
 
The agreement allows for the burying of the obscure dealings that took place with the Argentine oil company.
 
In 1998, Carlos Menem handed over control of the company to the Spanish and King Juan Carlos himself participated in that unclear negotiation.  It was always said that the monarch had been stained by a public and private power play over YPF's shares.
 
The agreement also buries the doubts that exist about the "Argentinization" of YPF. Néstor Kirchner participated directly in the operation and Brufau was his partner of privilege. Brufau has details of what they negotiated with Kirchner and that played a role in the secret proceedings of the Spanish oil company board.
 
These documents are locked under seven keys, because if it were disseminated, it would lead to a political scandal in Buenos Aires and Madrid.
 
Starting then, Repsol and YPF moved 140% of their profits abroad. Thus, since 2008, investment and production began to fall.
 
The decline continued with the nationalization, despite the comments which slipped out of the company. Miguel Galuccio’s 100 days plan failed and little progress was made in Vaca Muerta.
 
The change of the logo cost millions and was carried out by a consultancy linked to Cristinism.
 
Oil and gas production is falling in Argentina and gasoline prices increased 80 percent in two years. In addition, YPF began to increase its debt.
 
The form of payment to Repsol includes a serious feature: Repsol, Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank are going to handle those bonds on the market, in a sort of privatization of the Argentine portfolio.
 
But before that they must overcome a serious hurdle: no valuation exists or is known about from the Valuation Tribunal for a budget line for the payment of US$5 billion to Repsol. The absence of this audit will have political repercussions, since the agreement will fail to comply with the YPF nationalization law.
 
 
Ambito Financiero
Blejer: “Good for both parties”
 
Friday, February 28, 2014
 
The former president of the Central Bank, Mario Blejer, said yesterday that the agreement reached between the Argentine government and the Spanish oil company, Repsol, was "good for both parties" and "positive for the business environment.” He also argued that the measure will permit the inflow of investment in the energy sector and h hoped that it will allow for the IMF’s support in the dispute with the vulture funds.
 
"The agreement is positive for the country and the business environment in general and even if it does not solve all the problems with the international financial community, it does solve the lack of investment in the energy sector," said the economist in dialogue with National Rock radio FM. In that sense he argued that the resolution "will allow foreign investment and it is a good agreement for both parties, since Repsol also needed to solve the problem.”
 
"It is a good signal that will satisfy international institutions and, in addition, now the IMF would tend to support Argentina with the vulture funds,” Blejer estimated. Finally, he said that "the relationship with the Fund must be normalized, not from the point of view of taking credits, but in terms of the annual consultation.”