Dienstag, 12. November 2013
Billionaire hedge fund manager Paul Singer has dismissed attempts by Argentine bondholders to orchestrate a deal that would end his legal claims against the country, calling the initiative pointless.
Singer’s Gramercy Rebuff Blunts Talk of Bond Deal
By Camila Russo - Nov 11, 2013 5:59 PM GMT+0100
Billionaire hedge fund manager Paul Singer has
dismissed attempts by Argentine bondholders to orchestrate a deal that
would end his legal claims against the country, calling the initiative
pointless.
Exotix Partners LLC and Capital Economics Ltd. say Singer, whose Elliott Management Corp. is suing Argentina for payment on defaulted bonds, isn’t bluffing.
Billionaire hedge fund Manager Paul Singer. Photographer: Jacob Kepler/Bloomberg
After a decade-long legal battle, Singer may be only months away from receiving full payment on the debt
through U.S. courts, giving him no incentive to accept lesser terms in a settlement, according to Stuart Culverhouse, chief economist at Exotix. Singer’s disinterest in negotiating with owners of restructured debt led
by Gramercy Funds Management LLC may halt a rally in the bonds as
investors realize the legal claims against the country won’t be dropped,
said Culverhouse.
through U.S. courts, giving him no incentive to accept lesser terms in a settlement, according to Stuart Culverhouse, chief economist at Exotix. Singer’s disinterest in negotiating with owners of restructured debt led
by Gramercy Funds Management LLC may halt a rally in the bonds as
investors realize the legal claims against the country won’t be dropped,
said Culverhouse.
Elliott officials “just want to maximize their return,” Michael Henderson, an economist at Capital Economics in London.
“It’s been a decade already, so for an additional six or nine months,
it’s probably well within their interest to stick with their timetable.”
Argentine dollar bonds have gained 0.9
percent since the first reports of the Gramercy-led talks to find an
inter-creditor solution on Oct. 20, beating returns on emerging-market debt,
which lost 1.9 percent, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s EMBI
Global Diversified index. The gains extended year-to-date returns to
17.8 percent, the best among developing countries after Belize.
,
which lost 1.9 percent, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s EMBI
Global Diversified index. The gains extended year-to-date returns to
17.8 percent, the best among developing countries after Belize.Gramercy Plan
Gramercy’s preliminary plan calls for most holders of restructured bonds
to agree to cede part of their interest payments to investors with
defaulted securities in exchange for the holdouts to drop their
lawsuits, according to five bondholders approached by officials from the
Greenwich, Connecticut-based firm.
In order to change the terms of the notes to earmark coupon payments
to holdouts, Gramercy must garner approval from holders of 75 percent
of each series of bonds, according to the bond prospectus.
payments
to holdouts, Gramercy must garner approval from holders of 75 percent
of each series of bonds, according to the bond prospectus.
Katrina Allen, a spokeswoman for Gramercy at ASC Advisors LLC, declined
to comment on bondholder talks or Elliott’s statement. Norma Madeo, a
spokeswoman at the Economy Ministry, declined to comment on whether Argentina is willing to negotiate with holdouts or are supporting an inter-creditor plan.
Elliott said Nov. 7 it’s only willing to negotiate with the Argentine
government and has no interest in holding talks with fellow bondholders.
‘Sit Down’
“We welcome the idea of good-faith negotiations with Argentina, but we
don’t see the point of negotiating with other bondholders,” the New
York-based fund said
in an e-mail. “We have approached Argentina countless times about
negotiating a resolution to this dispute. It is completely within
Argentina’s power to solve this.”
said
in an e-mail. “We have approached Argentina countless times about
negotiating a resolution to this dispute. It is completely within
Argentina’s power to solve this.”
Elliott money manager Jay Newman said in an Oct. 7 Financial Times
editorial it’s time for Argentine President Cristina Fernandez de
Kirchner’s government to “sit down and discuss a resolution” with its
creditors.
Any out-of-court solution requires Argentina’s participation because
it’s unlikely that Gramercy will gather the support required to make its
plan work, said Diego Ferro, co-chief investmentofficer at Greylock, which owns Argentine exchange bonds.
officer at Greylock, which owns Argentine exchange bonds.
“If Argentina doesn’t get involved no plan that’s originated by
investors will work because they won’t pull together enough financing
and participation,” he said in a telephone interview fromBuenos Aires. “As soon as Argentina sits down to solve this, capital markets will open for them again.”
‘Got Personal’
Argentina hasn’t tapped international credit markets since its 2001 default on $95 billion, as it’s unwilling to pay the additional 8.14 percentage points over U.S. Treasuries that investors demand to hold the country’s dollar bonds.
markets since its 2001 default on $95 billion, as it’s unwilling to pay the additional 8.14 percentage points over U.S. Treasuries that investors demand to hold the country’s dollar bonds.
Argentina offered about 30 cents on the dollar for its defaulted debt in
2005 and 2010 debt swaps, which 93 percent of creditors accepted.
Fernandez has vowed never to pay the remaining 7 percent of creditors
she calls “vultures” more than what was offered in the restructurings.
in
2005 and 2010 debt swaps, which 93 percent of creditors accepted.
Fernandez has vowed never to pay the remaining 7 percent of creditors
she calls “vultures” more than what was offered in the restructurings.
“It shouldn’t matter where the money comes from but another part of this
is they’ve been pursuing Argentina for 10 years,” said Culverhouse at
Exotix in a telephone interview from London. “Money is one thing but
there’s also being proved to be right. I think things got personal a
long time ago.”
Navy Ship
Elliott has tried to embargo the presidential jet Tango 01 during a
fueling stop in the U.S., seize Argentine central bank funds deposited
in New York and successfully grabbed a Navy ship during a stop in Ghana for two months until it was freed in an international tribunal of the sea.
Argentina may
negotiate with holdouts after a clause in the exchange bond prospectus
that prevents the country from offering holders of defaulted bonds
better terms than those of its previous restructurings expires in
December 2014, according to ACM Consultores.
“Argentina will have more flexibility after December next year to sit
down and negotiate with holdouts,” Maximiliano Castillo, a former
central bank manager who runs ACM, said in a telephone interview in
Buenos Aires. “If the ruling hasn’t been executed by then, it may have a
window of opportunity to reach a solution outside of court.”
‘Strong Position’
Argentina is trying to avoid a second default in 12 years as the court’s
decision prevents third parties, including trustee Bank of New York
Mellon Corp., from passing payments to bondholders unless the nation
also pays holdouts. At 1,788 basis points, the nation’s debt is
the most expensive in the world to protect against non-payment over
five years with credit-default swaps, according to data compiled by CMA
Ltd.
is
the most expensive in the world to protect against non-payment over
five years with credit-default swaps, according to data compiled by CMA
Ltd.
While a New York court on Aug. 23 rejected Argentina’s appeal, it delayed the effect of the orders until the Supreme Court decides whether or not to take the case. Bonds have rallied since then on speculation legal delays will extend into 2014.
“The only thing working in Argentina’s favor is that they’ve managed to lodge appeals
to kick the process to 2014,” Henderson said. “From Elliott’s point of
view, they’re in a strong position. It may take some time for them to
realize payment but as it stands there’s probably no reason for them to
want to negotiate with any other bondholders.”
appeals
to kick the process to 2014,” Henderson said. “From Elliott’s point of
view, they’re in a strong position. It may take some time for them to
realize payment but as it stands there’s probably no reason for them to
want to negotiate with any other bondholders.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Camila Russo in Buenos Aires atcrusso15@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: David Papadopoulos atpapadopoulos@bloomberg.net; Michael Tsang at mtsang1@bloomberg.net
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen