Das sind die entscheidenden Fragen jetzt in New York ob Elliott u.a. ca 1.4 Mrd bekommen und ob wir unsere Tauschbonds bezahlt bekommen (3 Zahlungen im Dez)

Inhalt des 34seitigen Schriftsatzes an Griesa in NY um pro rata und third partie Problematik zu entscheiden.....


TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
i
I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1
II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 5
A. This Court Squarely Held That Argentina Breached The Equal Treatment
Provision And That Argentina Is Required To Specifically Perform Its
Obligations Under That Provision ......................................................................... 5
B. The Second Circuit Affirmed This Court’s Orders And Remanded For
Clarification On Two Issues .................................................................................. 6
C. Argentina Has Declared That It Will Violate This Court’s Orders And
Disregard The Second Circuit’s Opinion And Has Begun Planning To
Restructure Its Payment Mechanisms .................................................................... 7
D. Argentina Relies Upon Payment Systems Of The United States And
Entities Located In New York To Make Payments On The Exchange
Bonds ................................................................................................................... 10
III. ARGUMENT ................................................................................................................... 12
A. The Two Limited Issues Remanded By The Second Circuit Should Be
Resolved As Set Forth In The Plaintiffs’ Proposed Orders ................................. 12
1. This Court Correctly Determined The Operation Of The Ratable
Payment Formula In The February 23 Orders ......................................... 12
2. The Court Should Enter The Proposed Orders, Making Clear That
The February 23 Orders Bind Agents Of Argentina, And Parties
That Act In Concert With Argentina, Pursuant To Rule 65(d)(2) ........... 15
B. The Court Should Decline To Extend The Stay Of The February 23 Orders ...... 20
1. Argentina Has No Substantial Possibility Of Success On The
Merits ....................................................................................................... 21
2. A Stay Would Substantially Injure The Plaintiffs ................................... 21
3. Argentina Will Not Be Irreparably Injured By Refusal Of Its
Request To Continue The Stay, Especially Because It Can Post A
Bond To Protect Its Rights On Appeal .................................................... 23
4. The Public Interest Weighs Strongly Against A Stay .............................. 24
C. The Belated Interjections Of Purported Holders Of Exchange Bonds
Should Not Be Permitted To Delay Resolution Of The Second Circuit’s
Remand ................................................................................................................ 24
IV. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................ 26