A. PROCEDURAL HISTORY................................................................................................. 1
B. PARTIES’ ARGUMENTS REGARDING THE PROPOSAL TO DISQUALIFY
PROFESSORS TERCIER AND VAN DEN BERG AND THE ARBITRATORS’
EXPLANATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 12
1. Argentina’s Proposal for Disqualification ......................................................................... 12
2. Claimants’ Observations .................................................................................................... 14
3. Arbitrators’ Explanations ................................................................................................... 16
C. DECISION BY THE CHAIRMAN ................................................................................... 16
1. Request for Recommendation ............................................................................................ 16
2. Timeliness .......................................................................................................................... 16
3. Merits ................................................................................................................................. 17
D. DECISION ......................................................................................................................... 20
D. DECISION
83. Having considered all of the facts alleged and the arguments submitted by the parties, and
for the reasons stated above, the Chairman rejects the Argentine Republic’s Proposal to
Disqualify Professor Pierre Tercier and Professor Albert Jan van den Berg.
[Signed]
______________________________________
Chairman of the ICSID Administrative Council
Dr. Jim Yong Kim
https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC4152_En&caseId=C95
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen